i wrote: > ken wrote: > > pgf wrote: > > >i didn't know about user_extension until just now. it's a pretty modern > > >feature, as these things go, though it would probably be more generally > > >useful if it allowed for substituting the entire username, rather than > > >just appending to it. in any case, i suspect it's a new enough feature > > >(the man page even references qmail :-) that people are probably still > > >using it. > > > > Sigh. So you want to keep this? Or do you want to have this instead? > > sorry. i was rambling. i'm only saying that it should be dropped,
argh. that should say "shouldn't", above. -pgf > because, a) it's a pretty new feature, > so there are probably people actively using it, and b) it's quite a > useful feature -- on the fly modification (albeit limited) of the From: > address, in a way that caters to the variable-recipient feature found > in all major MTAs today. (i.e., pgf+mh@... or pgf-mh@...) =--------------------- paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 32.4 degrees) _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
