ken wrote: > >If you go with a pseudo component, I recommend using a well-defined > >prefix for it to avoid any potential collisions with a real component. > > Fair enough ... but getting back to the higher-level question ... any > thoughts there? :-)
well, if i'm still allowed to comment :-) -- i'd prefer the more broken-out solution, because it provides an in-line example of how one might also handle Reply-to: headers, etc. and there's less magic going on behind the curtain. so i'd choose door #3. paul =--------------------- paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 37.0 degrees) _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
