>A project where I'm one of the primary developers is in the planing >stages right now for replacing an awful, grotty template language which >accreted on our program over time. One one hand, I would say that the >sooner such things are replaced, the less pain there is overall. On >the other, the MH format language is not even remotely as bad as the >crawling horror that I'm about to replace, so maybe nibbling around the >edges is tollerable, given how much work it would be to rip it out.
Sigh. I don't disagree with you. But my concern is how much of my time that will take, right now. I'd like to get 1.5 out the door. So yes, there has been some thought in that direction, but not right now, okay? :-) --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
