On 2012-03-02, at 12:12 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote: > Specifically, if there is text after the last encapsulated message, then > it ends up as a new message. This isn't an issue if you just use > "forw", but it crops up if you use "forw -digest" (because you'll get > a message that says nothing but "End of digest").
Long ago I used burst on a regular basis to split the Risks digest (and a couple of others whose names have long faded from memory). I don't ever recall having this problem, but that was the dim past and I might have just ignored (and forgotten about) it. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
