>[ i tried to send this before, but something went wrong, and ken's >moving so fast these days, i feel compelled to resend asap. :-) ]
You say that like it's a bad thing! :-) > - if there are multiple addresses in From:, then require at least > one of Envelope-From: or Sender:. create a Sender: from > Envelope-From: if necessary, to satisfy the RFC. > - Choose the SMTP envelope header from > 1) Envelope-From: > 2) Sender: (no "iff" -- i don't think there's a need for that) > 3) From: Hm. You know, I like this (and it seems that there is widespread agreement that Sender: should always override From:). There is one wrinkle: Right now Envelope-From: can be blank; if you do that, then you will get a MAIL FROM:<>, which is useful if you don't want any bounces at all. Sounds like the logic should be if you have multiple From: addresses then Envelope-From: cannot be blank. Actually, now that I think about it I might have written the code that Sender can be blank, so I should fix that :-) --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
