Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> writes: > I've been living with "par" as my formatproc for a while now, and for > simple cases it's been great. But it has some unfortunate side effects. > It works "okay" on more modern messages designed to be reflowed (although > I still get q-p equal signs sprinkled throughout the message). But for > already-repl'able messages, especially ones with source code in them, > it really chews them up. So it's good for some things, not so good > for others. > > But that got me to thinking - maybe I could have a more intelligent > formatproc that could handle MIME?
I haven’t been following the discussion very closely, but what strikes me is, are you saying that it’s difficult to arrange (within mh) that a different formatproc is called (for each mime part) depending on the mime type? So your perl script does this? -- Jón Fairbairn [email protected] _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
