Hi Norman,
> Particularly, for use in connection with sortm, there ought to be a
> straightforward way of selecting precisely those messages for which a
> validly formated, relevant date field exists and has a valid format,
> or if you prefer those not having a validly formatted, relevant date
> field.
>
> Something like
>
> -before today -or -after today -or -after yesterday
I'm seeing some odd behaviour. I've one email in +inbox where I've
broken Date:.
$ p -after '01 Jan 2040'
pick: unable to parse date field in message 6608, matching...
1 hit
$ slp
6608+ 01-00 me test — =
Good, so that worked. The broken one without a date is treated as
matching.
$ p -before '01 Jan 1960'
pick: unable to parse date field in message 6608, matching...
6077 hits
$
Again, it matched, but why did every other email get treated as being so
old?
Cheers, Ralph.
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
