i wrote: > ken wrote: > > Greetings all, > > > > I think this time around we've gotten some more traction on this release; > > we've even got people upgrading from 1.0 (!) and on what sounds to be > > rather ancient hardware. As always, it turns out Paul Vixie was right ... > > a longer release cycle this time is definitely a good thing. > > > > So, I'm wondering ... what do people think so far of 1.5-RC2? Have you > > tried it? If so, are you happy with it? If you haven't ... how come? > > No judgement here, I'm trying to figure out what would make it easier > > for you to try it out. > > > > Any other comments, good or bad, are welcome. > > so far so good. > > one nit: when configured with sendmail rather than smtp (i used > the docs/contrib/build_nmh script to do this, so i can't quote what > that did under the covers), the "make check" step fails. all of > (well, most of ) the test-post-* scripts fail because they set up > a local fakesmtp program using -server 127.0.0.1 and -port BIGNUM, > and presumably send fails to connect to it due to the config.
heh. of course, send didn't actually fail, since my local sendmail program was working just fine. this morning i noticed that the outbound mailq on my colo server is full of mail to [email protected]. :-) paul =--------------------- paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 48.4 degrees) _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
