paul vixie <[email protected]> writes:
> On 6/6/2012 8:00 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
>> Our push recently (and by recently, I mean for 1.5) has been to set
>> POSIX as a minimum. We're not completely unreasonable about it,
>> but there are limits; we make that call on a case-by-case basis.
> ken, speak for yourself. i am completely unreasonable about it. i stopped
> supporting pre-POSIX "sprintf" results in BIND as of about 1995. it was
> controversial then. it is not controversial now.
Hmm, should I be worried about the fact that I'm running a pretty recent
BIND on this box? I've never seen anything that looked like snprintf
related misbehavior ...
regards, tom lane
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
