az wrote: > but: /bin/bash itself does set SHELL, so if it's involved > you'll have next to no chance of seeing this scenario.
That's it, thanks. > the nmh code tries to be "nice and helpful" and work with > the user's preferred shell, so we certainly waste > some cycles with /bin/sh -c whatevershell -c ...actual stuff... > > personally i don't think that aiming for the users' preferred > shell is necessary for the not-very-interactive situation > with whatnow, so the $SHELL -c code should indeed be dumped > in the long run. On second thought, I use bash-isms when looking for and adding attachments. I suppose we could only prepend the "$SHELL -c" if $SHELL is not equivalent to /bin/sh, but I don't think it's worth the bother. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
