Hi, Once again I've been bitten by a lone `sortm' defaulting to `all' when I intended to do `sortm lp'. On a folder of some 20,000 emails that quite perturbs incremental backups! `rmm' doesn't default to `all' so I'm not sure sortm should; it's too destructive as the old order may not be reproducible.
I suggest sortm without specifying a set of messages be an error. Old behaviour can be got through `sortm all' or a new option that folks can put in ~/.mh_profile if they're happy with it as it was. I'm off to create ~/bin/sortm like I should have done last time! Cheers, Ralph. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
