Paul F. wrote: > (one way to reduce the likelihood of this, and of the original > overflow issue, might be to pass the message arguments to rmmproc in > the same form that they were received by refile. currently "refile > all" causes a call to rmmproc with a full enumeration of message > numbers. if "refile all" instead caused "rmmproc all", on the > assumption that the same expansion would result, then the original > invocation of refile would be as likely to fail as rmmproc. there are > probably subtleties to this i'm not getting right now.)
I think this should work. rmmproc could call "pick <args>" to get the same expansion. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
