>Would a more general -noprofileparam be a more useful addition to >argument processing? That way, pick, scan, etc., when used in scripts >wouldn't be tainted by the user's preferences; I may like pick to have >-nozero by default.
We already have a LOT of -no* options to override particular options set in your profile. We're missing a few ones; that's what we're talking about here. I'm not against -noprofileparam, exactly, but I think it's a bit more complicated than you think (by the time smatch() starts parsing the options it's too late).. But I'm fine with -nosequence; like I said, it follows an already-established pattern. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
