ken wrote: > >unless anyone objects today, i'll push a simple patch which causes > >"related" to be supported for both mhbuilding and mhparsing. no > >special processing is done -- it just causes the subtype to be > >recognized. > > As long as you're in there .... could you do a couple more things? Please? > :-) > > - According to RFC 2046, if you get a multipart subtype you don't know about, > you're supposed to handle it as multipart/mixed.
i saw that in the comments. i think the code would do that -- if the parser would let the unknown subtype through. i'll see how hard that would be. > - Would you be willing to write tests for this stuff? Specifically handling > multipart/somerandomjunk? If you have questions about the test suite, just > feel free to ask; David Levine is probably the most up-to-date on it, but > I've done some work in there as well. okay. i'll look at that too. paul > > --Ken > > _______________________________________________ > Nmh-workers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers =--------------------- paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 26.1 degrees) _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
