>Yep. I've had similar interactions with the claws-mail folks... However, >their GUI is better than exmh, particularly for the increasing number >of attachments I'm receiving (well, that may not be fair...I should take >a look at any changes to exmh in the last 18 months).
You know, the more I think about it ... how would they even know that it kills performance? Maybe it was a big deal 20 (or even 10) years ago, but I have a hard time believing you'd even notice nowadays. And if they never implemented the code, how could they even have any idea if it affected performance or not? --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
