On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:38:13 -0400, Ken Hornstein said: > >if "the MH way" could expand to C89 and posix threads, we'd have some > >options that were both performance and correct. > > I think we already assume C89 as a minimum. However, I'm not sure I want > to jump off the threads cliff just yet :-/
"Some people see a problem and say "I know, I'll use threads". Now they have two problems" - jwz, misquoted. :)
pgpdjIWsVCfzs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
