On 2013-03-18, at 9:29 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote: > Maybe I'm not up on my nautical termology, and I know you sent out a > revision that said "1.5", but I'm confused. Is it you're thinking that > 1.5 is getting a bit long in the tooth (was released in June of last > year) and you want to think about a 1.6, or you want to think about doing > more on 1.5?
I'm thinking it's time to declare a break and say "anything beyond the tag we laid down today will break things." We have needed to do that for a while now. But we must declare a branch at that point, if only to push forward bug and security fixes for the people not ready or able to leap onto the new head we declare. --lyndon _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
