>> Sure, that would have been bad. But if instead the invalid character >> had been replaced by a ?, everything would have worked fine. > >That doesn't remove the possibility, it just makes it very, >very unlikely. If we're going to change something, we might >as well do it right. And, we wouldn't have to advise users >to not use "?" in aliases.
Um, wait ... I'm confused. How would it have _not_ completely removed the problem? In Valdis's case, the full header would be (after replacing the "bad" character with a ?): To: Mr Foo ? Bar <[email protected]> The email address would still be fully qualified, and aliases would never be checked. Am I missing something? --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
