>So you compile with lockf on a system running AFS. Don't tell me >this is a burden. Any shop running AFS is going to be well aware of >the underlying issues related to it and capable of dealing with it >themselves.
But ... why? I mean, seriously. That means that people who use system-provided nmh packages lose. I always thought compile-time configuration was something that was to be avoided. What exactly is your beef with making it runtime configurable? And how come you're bringing this up NOW, instead of when we hashed this all out in March? I proposed run-time locking configuration, and David Levine chimed in, saying he thought it would be a good idea. You posted on that thread a fair amout, but you never said anything about that bit, so I thought you at least had no objections, so I figured everyone was all on board. So why is this a big deal now? --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
