Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> wrote:

    >> On 2013-10-16, at 12:24 PM, Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >>> - Support the composition and display of format=flowed messages.
    >>
    >> This is long overdue, and should not be hard to implement.

    > Does that mean I can put you down for implementing it? :-)

Composition and display are different problems.  Getting the reply
setup from a format=flowed would address 90% of the problem.

It might be that it's enough also to just know how to specify that the text
is like that, and leave it to exmh/mh-e/vim-macros etc. to get it right.

    > RFC 3676 tells you how.  But let's say you have some source code you want
    > put in your draft; you probably don't want to have that set to reflow.
    > So how do you indicate that?  Something like mhbuild directives?  Just
    > thinking out loud here; what do others want to see?

I wasn't sure that format=flowed even made specific provisions for that.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     [email protected]  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [


_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

Reply via email to