>> It seems that this behavior is generally what you want... > >Agreed. I wasn't trying to get it changed, just that its behaviour is >non-obvious and undocumented. Yes, I know, patches welcome. :-)
Well, putting it in the mark(1) man page wouldn't be accurate, as it's really a feature of every nmh program that update sequences. But ... would you be happy with an update to mh-sequence(5) ? That's not a wonderful place either, because really that's something more involved with nmh internals, and there's nothing that really talks about how sequences are implemented. I'm not even sure mh-sequence(5) is the right place, since that's talking about things from a user perspective. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
