Ken wrote: > >[Ralph wrote:] > >If "attach" instead appended an mhbuild directive to the draft, would > >that make the path after that simpler? > > No. > > My feeling is that if you put a mhbuild directive in the draft, > you're prepared to deal with any issues arising from it. But I > don't think it's reasonable to use attach and have it put mhbuild > directives in the body of the email.
Why wouldn't that be reasonable? The logic would be simpler: In WhatNow? - If you run "mime", run mhbuild on the draft. - If you "attach", add the appropriate mhbuild directive. Do not do this if there is a MIME-Version header. In post(8): - Run "mhbuild -auto -nodirectives". David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
