> > I concur, although I'm not sure what the option should be called, > > because that thing is kinda long. Maybe -maxunencoded? > > That's fine. Or maybe -maxlinelength or -maxlinelen, on the theory > that the user shouldn't care how long the encoded line is. > > Or -maxtextlinelen, more descriptive but getting messy. -maxtextlen?
-maxnonqp? -qpencode if the value was the max+1? That removes a negative. Cheers, Ralph. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
