Ralph wrote: > sort(1) has this functionality. It's -c for check. -check? Don't see > why we should deviate.
sortm already has a -check, for a slightly different purpose. It was recently added, though, so maybe its meaning could be changed? David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
