ken wrote: > >I found this in my mailbox: > >[...] > > I definitely remember that (and that's on mhonarc.org), but I don't > recall Richard ever marking something as 1.0. He had a lot of 0.10, 0.20, > 0.25, etc etc releases.
well, it seems someone marked something as 1.0, because i just found this, which implies i was able to download it: > Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 18:05:59 -0500 > To: [email protected] > From: Richard Coleman <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: nmh 1.0 question > In-Reply-To: Message from Paul Fox <[email protected]> > of "Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:14:25 EST." > <[email protected]> > > part text/plain 995 > > hello richard -- > > > > i have a question, prompted by having just picked up 1.0. > > > > i seem to recall finding a bug in mh some time ago, that we may > > have corresponded about. (i can't find the mail, so it may have been > > via comp.mail.mh.) anyway, it had to do with doing an "inc" when > > the destination folder's filesystem is full, on linux. as i recall, > > inc wasn't checking for errors properly during its fwrite/fclose > > sequence, and behavior that worked on many systems failed on linux, > > which (i think) didn't report errors on fclose() that had been previously > > reported on fwrite() (or perhaps, looking at inc.c, which had been > > reported on fseek()). > > > > anyway, i think i may have noticed at the time that the mh-6.8.3 bug was > > still present in nmh. i believe you said you knew about it, and > > had a fix planned. > > I've been planning on doing an overhaul of the code in `inc', but > haven't found the time. Maybe in the next month. > > -- > Richard Coleman > [email protected] ---------------------- paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 34.0 degrees) _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
