>OK, I can reproduce it now. "%%l" obviously works in the common case
>but I don't if it should be changed all the time, or not used when
>there's a ct->c_termproc, i.e.,
>
> if (concatsw && ! ct->c_termproc)
>
>Or if parse_display_string() show look for the empty buffer when
>appending c_termproc? (Definitely my last choice.)
Okay, I think I understand the problem now.
With -concat, it's assumed that things aren't going to do their own
pagination (like I said earlier, the interface here is sort-of changed)
So defaulting back to "%lmoreproc" seems wrong if -concat is set but
c_termproc is also set. But how about:
if (concatsw)
if (ct->c_termproc)
buffer = "%lcat"
else
buffer = "%l"
else
...
Seem reasonable?
--Ken
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
