>> How we hit this needs a bit of explanation. > >Even with that explanation, I don't understand how that >commit broke that link. First let me ask, is >HAVE_GETUTXENT #defined in config.h? If not, why is there a call >to alert()? All appearances of it are protected by >#if HAVE_GETUTXENT.
I have to echo David's comment; if there's a call to alert() that isn't protected by #if HAVE_GETUTXENT (I also looked, and I didn't find any), then we'll gladly fix that. >http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2013-01/msg00020.html > >Can we continue the discussion from the points that he raised? My opinions on this subject have not changed. If you want to respond to those points I made, feel free. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
