>> I ... do not believe it will result in a functional change. I think >> that problem exists already. Also ... if you did that, exactly what >> are you trying to do, anyway? > >I often refile(1) with the source and destination folder the same; >`refile @. 42'. My +inbox is ever growing, ~/bin/sc does a scan of the >last `tput lines` - 1 of messages. If I want to collect emails I'm >about to process to the bottom of my inbox then I `refile @. ...'.
Hm. Does that happen to work with 1.6? I ask because I think you'll get a locking failure now, even if you aren't using -retainsequence. It looks like all folders are opened with locking set ... and I think that would cause sequence file lock contention. Would be nice to get that resolved before 1.6 goes out the door. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
