> > data, it wouldn't be very readable as q-p, so base64 might be a > > better choice. > >i don't see that kind of heuristic being made anywhere currently. does >that sound right?
The RFC-2047 encoder by default picks the shortest encoding between q-p and base64. However, that's specifically supposed to be human-readable. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
