lyndon wrote: > > it's a shame to have to foist the decision as to which to use (Attach > > or Inline) onto the user. > > Attachments are just that -- attachments.
kind of by definition. what client MUAs _do_ with those attachments is a question of semantics. and what gmail did (i.e., nothing) surprised me. > If you specify a disposition of > attachment (which we do), you can't complain about gmail doing what you > told it. au contraire. i can certainly complain, which is what i did. and now we're talking about how to fix it. paul > The Attach: header is just a simple shortcut for the user to attach bits > to be carried along with the message -- the most common case -- without > having to add mhbuild directives to the file. For anything more than > that (such as inlining), you need to use mhbuild directly. > > I always thought Attach: was a wart ... > > --lyndon =---------------------- paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 59.0 degrees) _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
