Ken Hornstein wrote: > Was the replyfilter problem just due to perl package dependencies, or > something else?
replyfilter works fine, having the functionality in C code would be nicer. Most of us do many things with nmh with separate scripts, including things like signing/encrypting messages. The only thing that marks replyfilter out from the rest of these is that you added a special hook for it and it is distributed in the contrib directory. Using mhshow piped to sed to add the '> ' prefix does just as good a job as replyfilter: I've used it that way since before replyfilter existed and it works even better now with 1.6 (thanks!). Most of the functionality is sort-of already there in nmh without resorting to perl: it'd be great of repl (or an mhrepl) could use it. Oliver _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
