>path-name would name a command which would be invoked by sortm. It would be >given 2 arguments, full path names of messages.
Are you suggesting that it be fork()ed and exec()d for each message (as opposed to have a long-running program that gets executed just once per sorm invocation)? If so, it occurs to me that it would be simpler to just make the > < decision based on the exit code of the process. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
