>> Sigh. I went around and around on this when I implemented it. The >> reality is a) there are some ISPs (not just AT&T) that it's the ONLY >> thing they implement, > >Is it definitely the only thing AT&T support? Has David opened a ticket >with them asking why they can't also support the new allocation? ;-)
If it was just AT&T, I'd lay the blame at their feet. But it's not. Here's another nmh user who had the same issue (even weirder, their SMTP server only accepted TLS ... on port 80): http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2013-12/msg00077.html If this was a theoretical, "Should we add this code or not?", well, maybe it's worth having that discussion. But the code is already there (and it's actually pretty small), people are using it, and I don't think it makes sense to remove it. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
