On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:49:23 -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jul 22, 2014, at 5:43 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> Ok - then making the local variable 'i' unsigned would work, but that would >> get into the middle of the flex generation. > > What is the filename and line number of this declaration of 'i'? I'm guessing > this is in the .c output from the corresponding .l file? Sorry, but this > isn't > entirely clear to me from your description. sbr/dtimep.c - generated from dtimep.l - line 2368 It's only a warning, and doesn't stop the compilation. The installation failed because I built as non-root, and it tried to install in /usr/local. >> [jerry@unix Downloads]$ rpm -qa | grep flex > > 'flex -V' please? What was built doesn't always match the package builder's > idea of what was built :-) [jerry@unix nmh]$ flex -V flex 2.5.37 > >> Linux unix.hobbeshollow.com 3.10.44-desktop-1.mga3 #1 SMP Tue Jun 17 >> 06:09:16 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > But what is the actual Linux distribution? Mageia Linux (http://www.mageia.org) > Release number? Release 3 > Patch level? (I don't run Linux, so I can't derive that info from the > kernel version stamps.) Not sure how to relate to that question. RPMs are updated from the original install as bugs/security holes are found. As far as I can tell, I'm patched to the 'current' level - no outstanding patches available. > --lyndon jerry _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
