Ken wrote: > >> Meh. Everywhere else nmh presents MIME parts in the order in > >> which they occur in the message; from what I can tell, > >> multipart/alternative was reversed just so the display code > >> would be easier to write. This seems like a lousy exception. > > > >mhlist is a counterexample. And a good one. > > It's obvious that was done because otherwise, you could never give a > consistent -part switch (it wouldn't make any sense if mhlist showed > a part number of 1, but in mhshow it was really 2).
I don't follow, but that doesn't matter. It makes sense to me the way it is now, so I don't want it to change. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
