>> I don't know who started that list, but I've been adding stuff to that >> based on what I use during nmh development. I hadn't needed to use >> RFC 2049, so that's why I didn't add it. But it probably makes sense >> to add it at some point. > >I find the list useful; I don't need them often enough to recall the >numbers. It would be nice to see ones that are "relevant to nmh" there >even if nmh doesn't implement them (yet). Your recent mention of RFC >6530 would be a contender.
Sure, next time I edit that list (it's a bit of a pain; I have to use CVS, ewww!) I'll add both of those. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
