Hi Ken, > Across different rules, where does the CFWS end up at when a reduction > happens? However, it really doesn't matter where CFWS ends up since > we ignore it (except for the case of the old-style addresses).
Rather than settle all the shift/reduce conflicts with %prec, etc., could it be that a different parsing technique would be more suited, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsing_expression_grammar always picks the first rule so you can remove ambiguity by careful ordering. Still work required, but different work. :-) Cheers, Ralph. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
