> >How about we add a getmymbox function escape?  It would do
> >what mymbox does, except return the user's (first matching)
> >mailbox name instead of 0/1.  It would return null if no
> >match, to support:
>
> I ... think I see what you're asking.  If given a list of addresses,
> it would search through them and return the first one that was part
> of Local-Mailboxes?

and Alternate-Mailboxes, yes.  mymbox already looks in both.

> We'd use the same search algorithm used by mymbox, right?  Just match
> the address portion?

Right, we'd in fact use the same code.  Just return a string
instead of a num.

David

_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

Reply via email to