Ken wrote: > You know, if I had my druthers I'd rather just write the code to use > the older but more widely supported fcntl() call to set FD_CLOEXEC; > that would avoid an autoconf test and make Lyndon happier :-) Also, > it looks like O_CLOEXEC is not actually part of POSIX? There are > also a bunch of calls to fopen() and for that we'd need to use > fcntl() there.
Good points. All the more reason to wrap the opens + fcntl(). David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
