Lyndon wrote: > But the inviteaccept and invitedeny (for a lack of any better > name) scripts would be contrib fodder at best.
As already noted, contrib hasn't worked. > The reason being that calendar processing almost always > includes interaction with external calendaring software. That's not at issue here. I can (and do, using my phone) reply to a calendar invite with an email message. It just works. There's no reason I shouldn't be able to reply with nmh instead of my phone. And I want to reply to encoded text/plain and text/html messages using repl and have it do a much better job than it does now. All of us do. Not all of us want to write our own scripts to do it, though. > We already have a need for this internally, as shown by the > multipart/signed discussion. That's another good example. I'd like to sign and verify using nmh. But not so much that I'm willing to run off and write scripts. If someone threw them into contrib, I might take a look, some day, because I'd expect some integration effort and false starts. But if I could do things like "show -verify", and "sign" at the whatnow prompt (or mhbuild -sign), and they just worked, I would. There's no reason I shouldn't be able to. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
