On 9 Nov, Ken Hornstein wrote: > >I have attached. I think it broke with nmh 1.6, it used: > >mhshow-show-multipart/signed: sigcheck %a %F > > That was probably my fault, but it would be helpful to figure out > exactly how it broke. It begs a larger meta-question: should we allow > a handler for multiparts? Those are sort of special and are normally > handled internally.
I did a git bisect and tracked this down to a2806483. A change which among other things "Fixed quoting of filename". It is clear that there is intentional code there to handle a multipart part by substituting a list of temporary files for each part. The new quoting results in them all being quoted together including the space separators and passed to the script as a single argument. Oliver _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
