Paul F. wrote: > david wrote:
> > Alternatively, something like this (completely untested)? > > > > msgs=`inc -format '%(msg)'` && [ -n "$msgs" ] && mhfixmsg $msgs > > but then i'd lose the default output of inc. msgs=`inc -format '%(msg)'` && [ -n "$msgs" ] && scan $msgs && mhfixmsg $msgs inc and scan use the same code for their output. > does mhfixmsg report (via exit code) whether it actually did anything > or not? the man page doesn't say. if not, using anno would be > difficult. No, it only returns a nonzero status if it found a problem. I'm still not convinced; if I was going to add the header, I'd do it whether or not mhfixmsg modified the message. If you want to see if it did modify it, you could run with -verbose. (And either filter out the "will not decode" messages, which should go away some day, or grep for the messages you're interested in.) David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
