Bill Wohler <[email protected]> writes: > Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> writes: > >>>okay -- i can accept all that. >>> >>>but at the least the documentation needs to keep up. mts.conf.man, >>>mh-tailor, the FAQ, should all mention that the basic client >>>connectivity has changed. >> >> Fair enough; that's a valid criticism. The FAQ is Bill's baby; it's kind >> of out of date and I haven't really wanted to tackle it. But I will take >> on updating those man pages. > > Yeah, that's true, but then I haven't received any contributions to add > to it :-). > > I'll make a quick pass now and at least update the nmh version number. > If you see anything that's blatently wrong, please let me know. A FAQ > update can be pushed out relatively quickly.
I've updated the nmh stable update version number and a couple of other things. While not strictly FAQs, perhaps it would be good to make a few additions that point out things in other answers that are currently wrong. The original content of the FAQ came from the comp.mail.mh newsgroup. I haven't had access to that for years, which is the main reason we haven't had a FAQ update in a long time. Does it still exist? If so, is there traffic, and is there an email gateway? As I was reacquainting myself with the FAQ, my first reaction was to remove all of the obsolete text, or references to sites that were no longer available. However, I thought better of it. This document encapsulates the long history of MH. What do you think? -- Bill Wohler <[email protected]> aka <[email protected]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
