Hi, I use the MARC.info mailing list archive a lot. It's referred to very frequently by a few projects, including OpenBSD.
I noticed a problem with their handling of attachments from nmh: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=140580811120125&w=2 I narrowed it down to the following header in mails with attachments (which I generate with "attach" at the whatnow prompt): Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----- =_aaaaaaaaaa0" I ran "mime" and then replaced the boundary value in the header and body with what I've seen in GMail emails: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=0016e68fcec4ab7a4004b3f7d05a This email was interpreted correctly: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=141691600206306&w=2 I'm guessing this is a bug in the MARC.info software, and I sent a bug report to the operators. But in the interest of pragmatism, would it make sense for nmh to pick a boundary value that is less likely to trigger bugs in other software? -- Anthony J. Bentley _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
