Ken wrote: > I think we always want to make sure the sequence file is consistent, > right? To me the choice is between "two calls to folder_read()" and > "one call to folder_read() but have it locked during the complete > command run". For a web front end, the latter choice makes more > sense. I would argue that the former choice makes more sense for > the average user.
Thanks, your explanation makes sense. I wonder if the two calls are a problem with disk caching. Though at some point a folder will get big enough to blow the cache. I'm not fond of -fulllock, but it does shorten to -fu. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
