>But, if the Cyrus code is no longer viable, we should be divorcing >ourselves from it anyway. For the basic use we make of SASL, >implementing our own client-side SASL support would be pretty straight >forward. The CMU code is license compatible, so we could lift what we >need from there as a starting point.
Ever looked at what it takes to implement the GSSAPI mechanism? Including encryption? It ain't so simple. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
