>> >[Norm:] >> >Shouldn't that be the default? >> >> You know ... maybe? What do others think? > >No, because date is the sender's context. And it's easy enough >to change how it's viewed.
I dunno ... I mean, do you care about the date an email was sent _in the sender's timezone_? Or do you care about the date an email was sent in _your_ timezone? Now that I think about it, I really care about when an email was sent in _my_ timezone. And I'm starting to get more emails with a specified timezone of +0000, which is annoying. That makes me think that the "standard" is for MUAs to display dates in local timezone. And ... well, it's "easy" enough to change if you have hacked on mh-format(5) before, like you and I. For others, as evidenced by the original email message on this topic, it's not so obvious. I am interested in hearing from others on this topic, though! If the timezone information is invalid ... well, it's a bit unclear what we should do here. I see we have a specific flag set for that, but it looks like according to RFC 5322 we should output "-0000" for the %(tws) escape if we weren't given a timezone. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
