Norm wrote: > Ken writes: > > >Secondly, when a mh-format program is run, it _cannot_ fail; > >literally, there's no facility for it to fail. When it gets > >compiled, yes, that can fail. But return an error code? We don't > >really have a good way in mh-format to deal with this. I think it > >might be too much. > > I would be content to just ignore the exit status.
I don't think that's a good idea. I just committed the multiply function. It was trivial. My feeling about mh-format is that we shouldn't invest much more effort in it. If there's a need for more capability, it should be tossed in favor something else, ideally something that already exists. But I share Ken's "Why bother?" at this point. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
