david wrote:
> Paul F. wrote:
>
> > http://www.foxharp.boston.ma.us/tmp/mh_samples/28.txt
>
> So, just "mhshow" does the right thing (parts 1.1.1 and part 2)
> for me. It does seem odd that "-type text/plain" doesn't show
> part 1.2. Esp. given that "-type text/html" does show part
> 1.1.1. But maybe it's due to trying too hard to obey
> multipart/alternative. And maybe I'm catching up to your
> thought process. But I still think that more than one part of a
> multipart/alternative should never be shown, unless they are
> requested by multiple -part switches.
okay. we're agreed that multiple -part options should override
"alternative". it wasn't at all clear to me that an
underspecified -type (i.e., "-type text") shouldn't do the same, but i
understand your reasoning.
for completeness, here's a case i didn't ask about. given my message 27:
msg part type/subtype size description
27 multipart/mixed 1534
1 multipart/alternative 845
1.1 text/enriched 33
1.2 text/html 295
1.3 text/plain 30
2 application/x-zip-compre 57 Dummy Attachment
what should "mhshow -type text/enriched -type text/plain" do? mh
currently just shows one of them. again, i feel it should show both,
but again, your (and ralph's) reasoning presumably says no.
paul
=----------------------
paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 12.2 degrees)
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
