Ken wrote: > ... maybe? It's always done it that way, even back in the original > MH. No one noticed until now.
My guess is that there aren't that many custom postprocs in the wild. And who knows what's in them. > >Have the interface to post(8), and thus postproc, include the > >`file' parameter as an environment variable as well. True, this > >means post has two places to get the data, but it also keeps simple > >filter scripts simple. > > Seems reasonable to me; any objections? I'm not a fan of environment variables, especially when they're not really needed. And one place to get the data is better than two. > >Though I still think it should be the last argument, otherwise > >every postproc author has to solve the same problem. > > I don't have strong feelings about this one; thoughts from others? > Fixing it is a simple change. I agree with Ralph. Putting the filename last is the best fix. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
